Go to content

"Where you can find almost anything with A Click A Pick!"
Skip menu
Skip menu
Skip menu
US Monthly Headline News
Story by Lee Moran

MS NOW’s Jonathan Capehart struggled to stop laughing after airing a supercut of Donald Trump’s claims on Sunday’s broadcast of “The Weekend.”

The montage featured clips of the president repeatedly insisting that, under him, the “immense power of the state” would never again “be weaponized to persecute political opponents” and that his administration “has acted swiftly and decisively to restore fair, equal and impartial justice under the constitutional rule of law.”

“Perhaps on Earth 2 that is what Trump did, but for those living here on Earth 1…” Capehart said, breaking into laughter, apparently at the contrast between Trump’s remarks and his actions since returning to office.
Story by Brandi Buchman

WASHINGTON — The final ruling of the Supreme Court term is over, but the stench of hypocrisy lingers.

If you were to read only one opinion that emerged as the final bell rung, it would likely be the birthright citizenship ruling that stopped President Donald Trump from telling people born on U.S. soil they aren’t Americans. From that ruling alone, one might believe the court’s image of itself as an unshakeable, immovable defender of the Constitution.

“The Framers of the Fourteenth Amendment extended that promise to ‘every free-born person in this land.’ We keep that promise today,” Chief Justice John Roberts wrote in the majority opinion.

But the justices closed out their term with a handful of more questionable decisions.

They supercharged the power of the executive branch yet again by giving Trump — and any successor — nearly unfettered power to fire independent agency officials, upending 90 years of precedent and blowing apart congressional oversight. The court also removed limits on how much money political committees can spend when coordinating with single candidates during an election, meaning corporate donors and billionaires will have more opportunity to influence elections.

And in a final swipe — of many this year — on equal protection laws, the justices upheld a ban on trans girls’ and women’s participation in sports while openly disparaging transgender identity as a “lie to the public.”
Opinion by Sydney Lake

MacKenzie Scott has become one of the most affluent philanthropists of our time. After all, she’s given away more than $26 billion during the past few years to thousands of organizations through her organization Yield Giving.

While many of her recipients had never received a gift of that size and many have called them life-changing gifts, not everyone sees her work in the same way. Take Elon Musk, who recently became the world’s first trillionaire, who thinks Scott’s giving is actually making the world “worse off.”

On June 27, Pubity, a major viral media and social news brand, posted on X about Scott’s giving, saying her $26.3 billion in donations has made her one of the “biggest individual donors in history.” The ex-wife of Amazon founder Jeff Bezos was recently confirmed as the biggest megadonor in 2025.

Then, an account with 22,500 followers with the name @FrenlyOfficer whose bio describes them as a “Heterosexual Alpha Male,” replied to Pubity’s post about Scott saying “Unfortunately, she’s spending it making the world a worse place.” Musk then responded to @FrenlyOfficer agreeing with the sentiment, saying: “Sadly, yes.”
Story by Ewan Palmer

A woman who alleges she was sexually assaulted by Donald Trump when she was 13 years old has gone into hiding over fears of retaliation.

A family member of the woman, identified only as Jane Doe 4, told The Guardian that she is “staying off the grid” and away from the Trump administration amid the fallout from allegations that resurfaced in the Jeffrey Epstein files.

Jane Doe 4 alleges she was abused and trafficked by Epstein, and that the disgraced financier took her to New York or New Jersey and introduced her to Trump when she was about 13 years old in 1984. The White House has described the allegations as “total baselessness,” a view it says is supported by the fact that the Biden administration was aware of the claims but did “nothing with them.”

The woman was interviewed four times by the FBI in 2019, when Trump was serving his first term, soon after Epstein was arrested on federal child sex-trafficking charges.

There is no indication that an official investigation into the allegation involving the president was conducted.
Story by TMZ Staff

The United States turned 250 on Saturday ... and a group of white supremacists celebrated by flooding the streets of the nation's capital -- much to the chagrin of their fellow Americans.

The Patriot Front -- a white supremacy group which was founded in the aftermath of the "Unite the Right" rally in Charlottesville, Virginia back in 2017 -- showed up in full force in Washington, D.C. ... gathering outside a public transit station.
Story by Atlanta Black Star New

President Donald Trump and Vice President JD Vance have been put on notice. Not by Congress or any court of law, but by a rogue military officer who couldn’t stay silent any longer.

Air Force Major Jason Watson risked his career to do what no one else in the military has done yet: call for the impeachment, conviction, and removal of Trump and Vance from office.

On Wednesday, Watson showed up at a news conference by the activist group Removal Coalition on the Capitol steps in full military garb in violation of Air Force rules. Removal Coalition lobbies members of Congress to impeach Trump.

Democratic Congressman Al Green, who has filed articles of impeachment against Trump at least a half-dozen times, escorted him to the gathering, according to NBC News.

“I’m here with him because Representative Green is the only member of Congress that has demonstrated the courage and conviction to … force a vote on articles of impeachment,” the service member stated.
Story by Matthew Chapman

Nobel Prize-winning economist turned political analyst Paul Krugman ran over the latest numbers on just how many people fell for President Donald Trump's self-enrichment scams — and came up with an astonishing figure.

This follows a New York Times report that details the losses to investors from Trump's cryptocurrency "meme coin" issued around his second inauguration.

That report estimated a loss of $3.8 billion — but more than that, Krugman noted, "even more surprising is the number of people who were in effect suckers here — almost a million. That’s really amazing."

Trump himself promoted the $TRUMP coin, noted the Times report, and while around 500,000 people did profit off the trades, it “reflects a small number of early buyers capturing enormous gains while the broad retail majority absorbed the losses,” said analytics firm Nansen — a classic hallmark of so-called "pump and dump" schemes, which are prosecuted as illegal when they occur in the stock market but are harder to police in the more lightly regulated crypto world.
Story by OK! Staff

President Donald Trump’s latest financial disclosure is drawing sharp criticism for revealing the extent to which he and his family have profited during his time in office.

The mandatory annual filing showed the president reporting more than $2 billion in income, including around $1.2 billion from cryptocurrency ventures tied to his family. The Wall Street Journal editorial board, owned by Rupert Murdoch’s News Corp, sharply criticized the Trump family for what it called “profiting off the Presidency in ways that demean the office.”

The disclosure showed Trump received $593 million from World Liberty Financial, the crypto venture he founded with Donald Trump Jr. and Eric Trump. The company’s CEO is Zach Witkoff, son of Steve Witkoff, the New York property investor Trump has used as a special envoy in the Middle East and Russia. Trump also netted $635 million from the $TRUMP memecoin he launched shortly before his inauguration.

The Crypto Windfall
The Journal’s editorial board argued that “The Trump clan is cashing in on the Presidency in big and sketchy ways,” pointing to World Liberty Financial deals with foreign actors and companies that may have been seeking influence.

The board cited past reporting on deals involving a crypto firm based in the United Arab Emirates and the government of Pakistan. It also noted that the UAE used World Liberty’s “stablecoin” to invest in Binance, whose co-founder Changpeng Zhao was pardoned by Trump after pleading guilty to violating the Bank Secrecy Act and serving a four-month jail term.

“A sitting president reporting more than $2 billion in income is not just unusual — it demands serious scrutiny,” said Christopher Lee, founder of Foresight Strategic Advisors, who has three decades of experience in political campaigns.
Story by Nicolai Haugsted

Donald Trump’s promise of hosting the biggest Independence Day fireworks celebration in American history produced an unforgettable night over Washington, D.C. — but not entirely for the reasons the White House had hoped.

According to Daily Beast, hours after hundreds of thousands of fireworks lit up the National Mall, city officials urged residents to stay indoors as smoke lingered over the capital, prompting a “Code Red” air quality alert warning of potentially unhealthy conditions.

Fireworks followed delayed celebration
Trump’s America 250 event was already running behind schedule after severe weather and evacuation orders delayed proceedings.

The president’s speech did not begin until after 11 p.m., pushing the 40-minute fireworks display well past midnight.

Around 850,000 fireworks were launched from ten separate locations across Washington in what Trump had promoted as the largest fireworks display ever staged.

“LET’S HAVE SOME FUN even if we are out late.”

By the time the finale ended in the early hours of July 5, thick smoke had spread across much of the city, partially obscuring the skyline and leaving a visible haze hanging over the National Mall.
Opinion by John Stoehr

I will spare you the details of the rightwing reaction to the Supreme Court's decision last week to uphold birthright citizenship. I will spare you because they are disgusting, especially on America's 250th anniversary. What you need to know is that the mainstream of the Republican Party is no longer flirting with the so-called "Great Replacement Theory." In GOP circles, the idea that immigration is "civilizational suicide" is now conventional wisdom.

I know the Democrats have a lot on their plates right now, but the rest of us need to push them into accepting this reality. Rightwingers no longer care, if they ever genuinely did, about the "illegal" part of "illegal immigration." As their reaction to the court should make clear, federal law and the Constitution are obstacles to overcome. To them, it doesn't matter what immigrants do or don't. What matters is who they are – namely their race, culture and religion – and from the viewpoint of these reactionaries, it's their humanity that's "illegal."

I think it's up to the rest of us to push the Democrats, because they tend toward inertia, not action. The party's mainstream – think Chuck Schumer – will interpret the Supreme Court's decision on birthright citizenship as the end of the story. Fact is, it's probably the beginning. First, because the court itself is corrupt and in need of punishment. It's only a matter of time before it strikes down 158 years of Constitutional law. Second, because we have been here before. Democrats used to think abortion was settled. Look where that perspective got us.
Elon’s Musk’s ‘DOGE’ cuts fleeced the government workforce during the beginning of Trump’s second term, eliminating tens of thousands of federal jobs and shrinking many agencies. NOTUS is reporting that now, the Trump administration is hiring again to address staffing shortages and operational problems. NOTUS also reporting that the Treasury Department has an internal report warning about the dangers of an ‘AI bubble.’ NOTUS reporter Eric Katz joins Way Too Early to discuss.
Fox News is drawing attention after repeatedly airing footage from Donald Trump's Great American State Fair that has fueled a new wave of online debate. This video examines the broadcast, the reactions to the crowd shots, and why critics argue the footage tells a different story than the event's public messaging. It also explores how the clips spread across social media and why the coverage has become a talking point for both supporters and critics. Watch the full analysis to see the footage, the surrounding context, and why this Fox News segment is generating so much discussion.
Back to content